_ _ AEPADTMENT OF THE NAVY
Rope FOr OORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7041S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON, VA 99204-2490
EGA
Docket No: 10499-14
peor
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated 5
August 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were
advised in our letter of li December 2012, that your application
had been denied.
Your current request nas been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. The names and
yotes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application and any material submitted in support of
your application.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that che substance abuse evaluation
and letter from your mother, even though not previously
considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the
existence of probable material error or injustice. Accordingly,
your application has been denied.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of reguiarity attaches to all official records.
a correction of an official
he applicant to demonstrate the
ror or injustice.
Consequently, when applying for
naval record, the burden ig on t
istence of probable material er
ex
sincerely,,
AEAA WV 7
Wh J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8072 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the medical evidence that you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8524 14_Redacted
your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the letter you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board, was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12084 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. The Board heard your case on 29 March 2011 under docket number #13731-10 and denied your petition. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11934 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of the record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10921 14
your latest reconsideration request Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 28 January 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that your assertion of post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4148 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 14 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO04148-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3580 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your reconsideration request on 14 April 2014. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by Docket No.NRO03580-14 the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8524 14
You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 17 November 2011, that your application had been denied. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the jetter you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8657 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by 2 Enree- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8101 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. consequentiy, when applying for naval record, the burden is on t existence of probable material a correction of an orth he applicant © error or injustice.